![]() But else, I'd go for the 35mm f/1.8DX (which is indeed great value for money), and see how that goes. There are other advantages to full frame too, and if those matter too then the story might change. ![]() Expect no miracles though, as the D7000 is already seriously good. Good, contrast-rich low light exists too, obviously, and in those cases, yes, then a D610 will give you some gain over the D7000. Is you need more than ISO3200 and you're not shooting sports, then the likelihood of the light quality being too lousy is rather high, in my (limited) experience. The problem with that kind of light is that shadows start to look a drab, dreary and noisy grey - no matter which camera you throw at it. Personally, I find more often than not this dream of super-high-ISO-virtually-noise-free-shooting turns more into a disappointment than that it actually makes a change and especially with natural indoor lighting, which often is indirect, flat and featureless. The D610 seems to be a lot of camera for its current discounted price. It will cover FF in a pinch, but I intend to keep my D7000 and have a Tokina 12-24 F4.0. I also have the 24-120 F3.5-5.6 but it isn't a good performer even on DX. I know the 70-200 has its limitations corner to corner and can be soft at 200 wide open but it's not horrible. Anyone out there have both the D7000 and a D610 and can comment on the noticeable or perceived differences in the two? įor the record, I currently have a 60mm F 2.8 macro, 85mm F1.8D and the 70-200 F2.8 VRI that will cover FF. Something new is coming soon and it will do something better than the D7100 so I'm a little torn about waiting for the expected new announcement vs taking advantage of a very good deal (that may not last) on a very good D610. The Sigma 35mm F1.4 is also a lust item that might be an option as well, if I decide to invest in some glass instead of a camera. I mostly read good things about that lens and they are certainly cheap enough. Īnother option would be to buy the DX 35mm F 1.8 and use it with my D7000. ![]() I loved the look of the photos and bokeh I got with that combo and am thinking a D610 and 50mm F1.8 would produce the look and perspective that started my love of photography in the first place. I cut my teeth on a Minolta X570 and a 50mm F1.7 lens. The D750 is a lust item but the difference in price is a hurdle for me. I would expect the low light focus of the D610 to be similar to what I have. For what I shoot, resolution is not a limiting factor and while the D7000 doesn't always find focus fast in lousy light, it is so much better than my previous D200 that I'm satisfied with it as is. I currently have a D7000 with some decent glass that will cover some FF and am wondering if the D610 will be a significant upgrade in low-light indoor photography? A friend recently bought a D7100 and while it has more resolution and a better auto focus module, it is noticeably noisier at ISO 1600 and above compared to my D7000. I am drawn to the low light performance it purportedly has. The recent 2nd price drop on the D610 has me seriously thinking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |